Adaptasi Skala Quiet Quiting (QQS) pada Karyawan di Indonesia

Authors

  • Juliana Sugandi Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Ibnu Zafad Mahbubulhaq Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Niken Astrya Murni Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Rinaldi Rinaldi Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/observasi.v4i1.2026

Keywords:

Adaptation, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Quantitative Research, Quiet Quitting, Scale Validation

Abstract

Quiet quitting refers to a phenomenon in which employees do not formally resign from their jobs but intentionally limit their work efforts to the minimum required. This study aims to adapt the Quiet Quitting Scale developed by Galanis et al. (2023) into the Indonesian context. A quantitative approach was employed involving 100 respondents drawn from both private and government sectors. The adaptation process included forward translation by three linguists, synthesis of the translated versions, and cultural adjustment to ensure contextual relevance. Data were analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) based on a three-factor model consisting of detachment, lack of initiative, and lack of motivation. The results indicate that the Indonesian version of the Quiet Quitting Scale demonstrates acceptable construct validity across the proposed factors. However, several items still require refinement, suggesting that further development and validation with larger and more diverse samples are necessary to strengthen the scale’s psychometric properties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arresti, A., Nugroho, R., & Santoso, D. (2023). Fenomena quiet quitting: Batasan pekerjaan dan tekanan kerja. Jurnal Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi, 11(2), 101–115.

Aydin, E., & Azizoğlu, Ö. (2022). A new term for an existing concept: Quiet quitting—A self-determination perspective. International Congress on Critical Debates in Social Sciences, 285–295.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Tenaga kerja. https://www.bps.go.id/subject/6/tenaga-kerja.html

Baldonado, A. (2018). Leadership and Gen Z: Motivating Gen Z workers and their impact to the future. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0601008

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276

Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., Siskou, O., Konstantakopoulou, O., Moisoglou, I., Gallos, P., & Kaitelidou, D. (2023). The “quiet quitting” scale: Development and initial validation. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/5tgpm

Hamilton, O., Jolles, D., & Lordan, G. (2023). Does the tendency for quiet quitting differ across generations? Evidence from the UK. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4488737

Haywood, S., Garbett, K. M., Craddock, N., Hayes, C., Saraswati, L. A., Nasution, K., Medise, B. E., Vitoratou, S., & Diedrichs, P. C. (2023). Cultural adaptation and validation of the positive and negative affect schedule for children (PANAS-C) among Indonesian adolescents. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3248947/v1

Heubeck, B. G., & Wilkinson, R. (2019). Is all fit that glitters gold? Comparisons of two-, three-, and bifactor models for Watson, Clark, and Tellegen’s 20-item state and trait PANAS. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.002

Khan, M. (2022). Quiet quitting: Understanding employee disengagement. [Publisher not provided].

Lord, J. (2022). Understanding quiet quitting as a workplace phenomenon. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(4), 567–580.

Mahand, T., & Caldwell, C. (2023). Quiet quitting: Causes and opportunities. Business and Management Research, 12(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v12n1p9

Novianty, S., Ananta, A. F., Putri, V. A., & Pangestoeti, W. (2025). Fenomena resign massal dan pengangguran terselubung di kalangan Gen Z: Tinjauan ekonomi publik di Indonesia. MASIP: Jurnal Manajemen Administrasi Bisnis dan Publik Terapan, 3(2), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.59061/masip.v3i2.1064

Putranto, D., & Natalia, F. (2022). Stres kerja dan keinginan resign pada generasi Z. Jurnal Psikologi Kerja, 8(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.36490/jmdb.v1i3.590

Scheyett, A. (2022). Quiet quitting. Social Work, 68(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swac051

Sladek, S., & Grabinger, A. (2014). The first generation of the 21st century has arrived! https://www.xyzuniversity.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/GenZ_Final-dl1.pdf

Suliyanto. (2018). Metode penelitian bisnis: Untuk skripsi, tesis, dan disertasi. PT Andi Offset.

Taufik, M., Hidayat, R., & Lestari, S. (2024). Krisis makna kerja dan quiet quitting pada generasi Z. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 12(3), 200–215.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

Xueyun, Z., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., Khalilur Rahman, M., Gao, J., & Yang, Q. (2023). Modelling the significance of organizational conditions on quiet quitting intention among Gen Z workforce in an emerging economy. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42591-3

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

Juliana Sugandi, Ibnu Zafad Mahbubulhaq, Niken Astrya Murni, & Rinaldi Rinaldi. (2026). Adaptasi Skala Quiet Quiting (QQS) pada Karyawan di Indonesia. Observasi : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Psikologi, 4(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.61132/observasi.v4i1.2026

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.