Pengaruh Gaya Belajar terhadap Tingkat Prestasi Belajar Remaja di Bukittinggi

Kania Jeanrita; Tiara Eristina; Deby Amanda Putri; Ilham Fitra

doi:10.61132/observasi.v3i3.1412

Authors

Kania Jeanrita Universitas Negeri Padang
Tiara Eristina Universitas Negeri Padang
Deby Amanda Putri Universitas Negeri Padang
Ilham Fitra Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/observasi.v3i3.1412

Keywords:

Visual, auditory, kinesthetic-learning-styles, learning-achievement

Abstract

This research was studied in order to describe how the influence of learning types consisting of visual, audiotorial, and kinesthetic learning types on the learning achievement of young students in Bukittinggi. How to collect data in research through questionnaires and documentation. Shiva who is 15-18 years old is the population in this study. There were 100 participants in this study who were selected through the cluster random sampling technique. This hypothesis was tested through linear regression analysis with a gain of 0.07. The results of this study indicate that there is a significant influence between each learning style, namely visual, audiotorial, and kinesthetic learning styles on student learning outcomes in Bukittinggi. This is indicated by the results of the visual learning style determination test with a percentage of 21.37%, 54.70% auditory learning style, and 23.93% kinesthetic learning style.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abire, A. L., Geradus, U., & Bire, J. (2014). Pengaruh gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 44(2).

Ahmad, S., Safee, S., & Afthanorhan, W. M. (2014). Gaya belajar terhadap prestasi matematika di kalangan mahasiswa perguruan tinggi.

Ahmadi, A., & Supriyono, W. (2004). Psikologi belajar. Rineka Cipta.

AS. (2022, Oktober 25). Hasil Ujian Nasional di AS jadi bukti kemunduran hasil belajar anak-anak semenjak pandemi. VOA Indonesia. https://www.voaindonesia.com/amp/hasil-ujian-nasional-di-as-jadi-bukti-kemunduran-hasil-belajar-anak-anak-semenjak-pandemi/6804118.html

Borich, G. D. (1988). Effective teaching methods. Pearson Education India.

Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review.

Damayanti, A. K. (2012). Gaya belajar ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian dan jenis kelamin. Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 1(2).

De Porter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2000). Quantum learning. PT Mizan Publika.

Fitriwati, D. G. (2018). The effect of motivation on the learning achievement. Indonesian Journal of Integrated English Language Teaching, 4(2), 198–207.

Pujiarti, A. (2013). Hubungan antara gaya belajar dengan prestasi belajar siswa kelas V SD Negeri Percobaan 4 Wates Kulon Progo tahun ajaran 2012/2013 [Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta].

Rambe, M. S., & Yarni, N. (2019). Pengaruh gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik terhadap prestasi belajar siswa SMA Dian Andalas Padang. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 2(2), 291–296.

Rosyid, M. Z., Mansyur, M., Abdullah, A. R. (2019). Prestasi belajar. Literasi Nusantara.

Syafi’i, A., Marfiyanto, T., & Rodiyah, S. K. (2018). Studi tentang prestasi belajar siswa dalam berbagai aspek dan faktor yang mempengaruhi. Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, 2(2), 115–123.

Vaishnav, R. S., & Chirayu, K. C. (2013). Learning style and academic achievement of secondary school students. Voice of Research, 1(4), 1–4.

Wahyuni, Y. (2017). Identifikasi gaya belajar (visual, auditorial, kinestetik) mahasiswa pendidikan matematika Universitas Bung Hatta. JPPM (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 10(2).