Perbandingan Angka Keberhasilan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Jenis Klasik Antara Balon Dikempiskan dan Dikembangkan Sebagian pada Pasien Dewasa

Mustika Sari; M Heru Saputra; Heni Purwaningsih

doi:10.61132/vitamin.v1i1.993

Authors

Mustika Sari ITS PKU Muhammadiyah Surakarta
M Heru Saputra ITS PKU Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Heni Purwaningsih ITS PKU Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/vitamin.v1i1.993

Keywords:

Adult Patients, Comparison, LMA

Abstract

Background: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is a relatively new airway device, which acts between the facemask and the endotracheal tube (ETT). The LMA provides a new strategy in airway management. Ease and speed of insertion, no need for muscle paralysis and visualization of the glottis make LMA an option in airway management of patients in short-duration surgery.Objective of the study: to determine the comparison of the success rate of classical Laryngeal mask airwar (LMA) insertion between deflated and partially developed balloons in adult patients. Research method: This study used a quasi- experimental method or pseudo-experiment by direct observation of 70 respondents, and the experimental design in this study was two group posttest only design. Results: The research data were analyzed by statistical tests using parametric tests, namely the t-test. The results showed that the LMA balloon was partially developed successfully as many as 35/35 respondents (100.0%) the balloon technique was deflated successfully as many as 29/35 respondents (82.9%) unsuccessful 6 (17.1%). There is a difference in the success rate of classical LMA installation between deflated and developed balloons, with a significance value in the hypothesis test results showing (P = 0,014 < 0,05).Conclusion: The success rate of LMA insertion with the partially developed balloon LMA technique in adult patients is higher than the deflated balloon LMA technique. Thus it can be concluded that Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agung, H. (2015). Referat Laryngeal Mask Airway (Pada Penatalaksanaan Jalan Nafas yang Sulit). Bagian Anesthesiologi dan Reanimasi FK UGM, Yogyakarta.

Arikunto, S. (2020). Prosedur penelitian. PT Rineka Cipta.

Bosson, N. (2013). Laryngeal mask airway. Medscape. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/82527-overview#a17

Brambrink, A., & Mahmoodpoor, A. (2013). The ASA difficult airway algorithm: Analysis and presentation of a new algorithm. Dalam Hagberg, C. A. (Ed.), Benumof and Hagberg’s Airway Management (Edisi ke-3).

Gropper, M. A., Cohen, N. H., Eriksson, L. I., Fleisher, L. A., Leslie, K., & Wiener-Kronish, J. P. (2021). Miller Anesthesia (Edisi ke-9).

Harahap, Y. S., Tavianto, D., & Surahman, E. (2016). Perbandingan angka keberhasilan pemasangan laryngeal mask airway (LMA) jenis klasik pada usaha pertama antara teknik balon dikempiskan dan dikembangkan sebagian pada pasien dewasa. Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif, 4(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.15851/jap.v4n1.743

Hartono, P. (2017). Referat LMA. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/doc/32734500/Referat-LMA

Ivan Atjeh. (2018). Anatomi dan jalan napas pemasangan LMA. Bing. https://www.bing.com/images/search

Jaya, I. M. L. M. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Anak Hebat Indonesia.

Mahmoodpoor, A., Hamidi, M. N., & Parish, M. (2013). Comparison of three methods for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults: Standard, lateral, and rotational. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.1752

Mangku, G., & Senapathi, T. G. A. (2010). Ilmu anestesi dan reanimasi. PT Indeks.

Morgan, G., & Mikhail, M. (2013). Clinical Anesthesiology (Edisi ke-5). McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199210000-00057

Notoatmojo. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kesehatan. Rineka Cipta. https://anyflip.com/qyutr/cqzc/basic/301-325

Nursallam. (2017). Metodologi penelitian ilmu keperawatan. Salemba Medika.

Pardo, M., & Miller, R. D. (2017). Basics of Anesthesia (Edisi ke-7).

Pramono, A. (2017). Buku kuliah anestesi. EGC. http://katalogdpkprovbanten.perpusnas.go.id/detail-opac?id=25743

Retnawati, H. (2017). Teknik pengambilan sampel. Jurnal Metode Penelitian, 13(13), 1576–1580.

Sood, J. (2021). Laryngeal mask airway and its variants. Indian Journal of Anesthesia, 49(4), 275–280.

Sudaryono. (2021). Statistik I: Statistik deskriptif untuk penelitian. Penerbit Andi. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Statistik_I/sn4EAAAQBAJ

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Alfabeta Bandung.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Alfabeta Bandung.

Zeng, Z., Tay, W. C., Saito, T., Thinn, K. K., & Liu, E. H. (2018). Manajemen jalan nafas yang sulit selama anestesi: Tinjauan insiden dan solusinya. Jurnal Anestesiologi dan Perawatan Kritis, 1(1), 1–6.