Pengaruh Konseling Psikoanalisis Klasik Terhadap Perilaku Rasionalisasi Konseli

Authors

  • Irma Julita Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Netrawati Netrawati Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Yeni Karneli Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/observasi.v3i3.1390

Keywords:

counselee, Counseling, rationalization behavior

Abstract

This research is motivated by the existence of inappropriate behavior in a student who often justifies his behavior even though the behavior he shows is wrong. The objective to be achieved in this study is to determine whether there is a significant difference before and after classical psychoanalytic counseling is carried out on rationalization behavior towards the client. This research method uses a pre-experimental one group, pre-test-post test approach. The population is one of the students of the State Islamic University of Bukittinggi. The data is processed using the Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) version 26 program using the Wilcoxon test. The results obtained in this study were changes in values ​​between before and after counseling. Which means that there is a change in rationalization behavior before and after treatment is given. So it can be concluded that classical psychoanalytic counseling can be carried out in handling rationalization behavior towards the client. So, it is recommended that counselors when conducting counseling can use the classical psychoanalytic counseling model in dealing with one of the client's inappropriate behaviors, especially rationalization behavior.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Corey, G. (2013). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy (9th ed.). Brooks/Cole.

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Free Press.

Edi, & Victoria, E. (2018). Pembuktian Fraud Triangle Theory Pada Financial. Jurnal Benefita 3(3) Oktober 2018 (380-395), 3(September), 380–395.

Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T. (2017). Theories of Personality (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Gamayuni, A. P. dan R. R. (2015). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Perspektif Fraud Diamond (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan LQ-45 yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2009-2013). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, Vol. 20 No. 1, Januari 2015, 19–34.

Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1993). Theories of Personality (4th ed.). Wiley.

Halonen, Jane S. dan Santrock, John W. (1996). Psycholgy: Contexts of Behavior. Brown & Benchmark.

Pervin, Lawrence A. dan John, Oliver P. (1997). Personality: Theory and Research, 7th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Sari, D. S., Kristanto, & Djoko, K. (2017). Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Triangle (Tekanan,

Kesempatan Dan Rasionalisasi) Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Pada

Mahasiswa. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Sistem Teknologi Informasi Vol. 13 No 4 Desember 2017: 464 – 472, 13(February), 464–472.

Yusuf, S., & Nurihsan, J. (2006). Landasan Bimbingan dan Konseling. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Zimbelman, M. F., Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., & Albrecht, C. O. (2014). Forensic Accounting. Cengage Learning.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-17

How to Cite

Irma Julita, Netrawati Netrawati, & Yeni Karneli. (2025). Pengaruh Konseling Psikoanalisis Klasik Terhadap Perilaku Rasionalisasi Konseli. Observasi : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Psikologi, 3(3), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.61132/observasi.v3i3.1390